---
description: Dating > Jebu
---

# Jebu

**Click here:** \
&#x20;\
&#x20;※ [**Jebu**](http://stetladana.datingsvr.ru/?dt\&keyword=jebu\&source=gitbook.com5_poster) \
&#x20;\
&#x20;※ [**♥ Jebu**](http://stetladana.datingsvr.ru/?dt\&keyword=jebu\&source=gitbook.com5_poster) \
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\
&#x20;\


On y trouve des stalagmites et des piliers en lave ainsi que des chauves-souris. These rabbinical sources also argued that as part of the price of Abraham's purchase of the Cave of Machpelah , which lay in the territory of the Jebusites, the Jebusites made Abraham grant them a that his descendants would not take control of Jebus against the will of the Jebusites, and then the Jebusites engraved the covenant into ; the sources state that the presence of the bronze statues are why the Israelites were not able to conquer the city during Joshua's campaign. An example of these records are the , several of which were written by the chieftain of Jerusalem and call Jerusalem either Urusalim URU ú-ru-sa-lim or Urušalim URU ú-ru-ša 10-lim 1330s BCE.\
&#x20;![jebu](http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/92662517.jpg)\


Hyeopjae-ri possède une des plus belles plages de l'île, la plage Hyopjae à l'ouest de la ville, en face de l'île de Biyang et longue de 9 km. The Books of Kings state that once Jerusalem had become an Israelite city, the surviving Jebusites were forced by Solomon to become ; though since some archaeologists believe that the Israelites were simply an emergent subculture in Canaanite society, it is possible that this is an aetiological explanation for serfs rather than a historically accurate one. See also the table of more than ten successive versions of script beginning from circa 1000 B. Araunah Another Jebusite, referred to as Ornan by the is described by the as having sold his to King David, which David then constructed an altar on, the implication being that the altar became the core of the. Par endroit, les parois de la grotte sont recouvertes de calcaire avec des stalactites et des stalagmites en calcaire. Dans ses frontières actuelles, la zone administrative de Jeju-si est l'une des deux divisions de la province de Jeju. Le marché Dongmun Jeju est la capitale de la province de en. Ce parc est constitué par les décors qui ont servi au tournage de la série télévisée. Merci pour votre inscription, nous vous enverrons les informations de mise à jour pour la société à l'adresse. Retrieved 11 September 2010. The council governed the region and had representatives of further devolved councils who no longer have any power. Cette colline est couronnée par le petit pavillon de Suwoljong et par une station météorologique.

La ville possède quelques musées, dont les plus importants sont : Le musée national de Jeju présente l'histoire et l'héritage culturel de l'île depuis la préhistoire jusqu'à la dynastie. Takodje, oglasivaci i posjetioci su potvrdili da se na sadrzaju koji postavljaju na sajt nalaze lica od 18 godina ili starija u trenutku kada je taj sadrzaj proizveden. De l'autre côté de cette montagne, elle jouxte le territoire de la ville de. Il est couronné par le pavillon de Mangyong et offre une vue sur la mer et le mont Halla.\
&#x20;![jebu](http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/91985088.jpg)\


**Mamu jebu** - Il comprend également quatre bourgades et trois communes rurales. Dve bulje, jos bolji sex!\
&#x20;![jebu](http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/92706228.jpg)\


The as well as state that Jerusalem was known as Jebus prior to this event. According to some , the city was conquered by King in 1003 BCE, as indicated by the academic consensus, or according to other sources like the unreliable in 869 BCE. The identification of Jebus with Jerusalem has been disputed, principally by. Supporting his case, every non-biblical mention of Jerusalem found in the refers to the city as 'Jerusalem'. An example of these records are the , several of which were written by the chieftain of Jerusalem and call Jerusalem either Urusalim URU ú-ru-sa-lim or Urušalim URU ú-ru-ša 10-lim 1330s BCE. Also in the , it is called Beth-Shalem, the house of Shalem. Lemche states: There is no evidence of Jebus and the Jebusites outside of the. Some scholars reckon Jebus to be a different place from Jerusalem; other scholars prefer to see the name of Jebus as a kind of pseudo-ethnic name without any historical background. The contains the only surviving ancient text known to use the term Jebusite to describe the pre-Israelite inhabitants of Jerusalem; according to the at 10, the Jebusites are identified as a Canaanite tribe, which is listed in third place among the Canaanite groups, between the and the. Prior to modern archaeological studies, most held the opinion that the Jebusites were identical to the Hittites, which continues to be the case, though less so. However, an increasingly popular view, first put forward by , professor of and at the , is that the Jebusites were most likely an tribe; Lipinski identified them with the group referred to as Yabusi'um in a letter found in the archive of. As Lipinski noted, however, it is entirely possible that more than one clan or tribe bore similar names, and thus that the Jebusites and Yabusi'um may have been separate people altogether. In the Amarna letters, mention is made that the contemporaneous king of Jerusalem was named , which is a invoking a named. This implies that the Jebusites were Hurrians themselves, were heavily influenced by Hurrian culture, or were dominated by a Hurrian class i. Richard Hess 1997:34—6 points to four Hurrian names in the Bible's Conquest narrative: Piram king of Jarmuth and Hoham king of Hebron Jos 10:3 , Sheshai and Talmai, sons of Anak Jos 15:14 with Hurrian-based names. The Hebrew Bible describes the Jebusites as dwelling in the mountains besides Jerusalem. In , the 'good and large land, flowing with milk and honey' which was promised to Moses as the future home of the oppressed Hebrew people included the land of the Jebusites. According to the , Adonizedek led a confederation of Jebusites, and the tribes from the neighbouring cities of Jarmut, , and against Joshua, but was soundly defeated and killed. Certain modern archaeologists now believe that the conquest of Canaan by the under Joshua simply didn't happen, and that the Israelites actually originated as a subculture in Canaanite society. Some biblical scholars believe that the accounts in the Book of Joshua are cobbled together from of disconnected battles, with numerous different aggressors, which occurred over a time period of over 200 years. According to the Second Book of Samuel, the Jebusites still had control of Jerusalem at the time of King David, but David wished to take control of the city. Understandably the Jebusites contested his attempt to do this, and since Jebus was the strongest fortress in Canaan they gloated that even the blind and lame could withstand David's siege. According to the version of the story in the , David managed to conquer the city by a surprise attack, led by , through the water supply tunnels Jerusalem has no natural water supply except for the. Ever since its discovery in the 19th century, , part of a system which connects the spring to the city, has been cited as evidence for the plausibility of such a line of attack; however, the discovery, at the turn of the 21st century, of a set of heavy fortifications, including towers, around the base of the Warren's Shaft system and the spring, has made archaeologists now regard this line of attack as implausible, as it would be an attack against one of the most heavily fortified parts, and hardly a surprise. The Books of Kings state that once Jerusalem had become an Israelite city, the surviving Jebusites were forced by Solomon to become ; though since some archaeologists believe that the Israelites were simply an emergent subculture in Canaanite society, it is possible that this is an aetiological explanation for serfs rather than a historically accurate one. It is unknown what ultimately became of these Jebusites. According to this hypothesis, after the disgrace of a rival Elide faction of priests in the struggle for succession to David, the family of Zadok became the sole authorized Jerusalem clergy, so that a Jebusite family monopolized the Jerusalem clergy for many centuries before becoming sufficiently attenuated to be indistinguishable from other or. The First Book of Chronicles states that the inhabitants of Jebus forbade King David from coming to Jerusalem shortly after he was made king. Joab went up first and took the city and became chief and captain of David's armed forces. Melchizedek Jerusalem is referred to as Salem rather than Jebus in the passages of Genesis describing Melchizedek. According to Genesis, the ruler of Salem in the time of was also Melchizedeq , and that as well as being a ruler, he was also a priest. The Mediæval French Rabbi believed that Melchizedek was another name for , son of , despite Abraham's supposed descent from the line of Shem's son. Later, is described as defeating a Jebusite king named. Scholars are uncertain, however, whether Melchizedek was himself intended in the Genesis account to be understood as a Jebusite, rather than a member of another group in charge of Jerusalem prior to the Jebusites. Melchizedek, as a priest as well as king, was likely to have been associated with a sanctuary, probably dedicated to Zedek, and scholars suspect that the Temple of Solomon was simply a natural evolution of this sanctuary. Araunah Another Jebusite, referred to as Ornan by the is described by the as having sold his to King David, which David then constructed an altar on, the implication being that the altar became the core of the. Araunah means the lord in , and so most scholars, since they consider the Jebusites to have been Hittite, have argued that Araunah may have been another king of Jerusalem; some scholars additionally believe that is actually a disguised reference to Araunah, the having been corrupted to. The argument originated from Cheyne, who, prior to knowledge of the Hittite language, proposed the reverse. The narrative itself is considered by some scholars to be and of dubious. The Jebusite hypothesis Some scholars have speculated that as also Zadoq does not appear in the text of Samuel until after the conquest of Jerusalem, he was actually a Jebusite priest co-opted into the Israelite state religion. Further support for this theory comes from the fact that other Jebusites resident in pre-Israelite Jerusalem bore names invoking the principle or god Zedek Tzedek see, e. Under this theory the ascribed to Zadok is a later, anachronistic interpolation. According to classical , the Jebusites derived their name from the city of Jebus, the , which they inhabited. These rabbinical sources also argued that as part of the price of Abraham's purchase of the Cave of Machpelah , which lay in the territory of the Jebusites, the Jebusites made Abraham grant them a that his descendants would not take control of Jebus against the will of the Jebusites, and then the Jebusites engraved the covenant into ; the sources state that the presence of the bronze statues are why the Israelites were not able to conquer the city during Joshua's campaign. The of the go on to state that King David was prevented from entering the city of Jebus for the same reason, and so he promised the reward of captaincy to anyone who destroyed the bronzes — Joab performing the task and so gaining the prize. The covenant is dismissed by the rabbis as having been invalidated due to the war the Jebusites fought against Joshua, but nevertheless David according to the rabbis paid the Jebusites the full value of the city, collecting the money from among all the Israelite tribes, so that the city became their. In reference to 2 Samuel 5:6, which refers to a saying about the blind and the lame, quotes a which argues that the Jebusites had two statues in their city, with their mouths containing the words of the covenant between Abraham and the Jebusites; one figure, depicting a blind person, represented , and the other, depicting a lame person, representing. The politicians and among others have claimed that are descended from the Jebusites, in an attempt to argue that Palestinians have a historic claim to Jerusalem that precedes the Jewish one, similar to the more common Palestinian Arab claim that they are descended from the. Retrieved 11 September 2010. Retrieved 17 December 2011. Archived from on 2014-02-21. This, Lipinski says, implies the existence of a tribe or clan of Yabusi, or Jebusites. The Semitic letter Y becomes a J in Germanic languages such as English. However, the clan of Jebusites in the Mari letter may not be the same as the clan of Jebusites living in pre-Davidic Jerusalem. More than one clan or tribe could have had the same name, Lipinski cautions. Jones, Nathan Narratives JSOT Supplement p. This is inconsistent with other Biblical passages, however, that suggest that a Jebusite faction at King David's court possibly including Bathsheba, Nathan, and Zadok helped highjack the monarchic succession from David's older son, Adonijah, to the younger Solomon. The versions presented in are even more confusingly similar. See also the table of more than ten successive versions of script beginning from circa 1000 B. At many periods the letters are virtually indistinguishable. Cline, Jerusalem Besieged: From Ancient Canaan to Modern Israel Univ. Press, 2004 , pp. Albright, History, Archeology, and Christian Humanism New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964 , pp. Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic: Essays in the History of the Religion of Israel. Jerusalem in Ancient History and Tradition. The Jewish Time Line Encyclopedia: A Year-by-Year History From Creation to the Present. Studia Phoenicia 18 Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta Book 127. A History of Israelite Religion in the Old Testament Period. Westminster John Knox Press. Festschrift Alfred Bertholet zum 80. Jerusalem in Ancient History and Tradition. Bolin, , , , Ingrid Hjelm, , , Sara Mandell, , Margreet Steiner, John Strange and Keith Whitelam.
